More changes to the construction legal framework
Daniel Vlasceanu – Partner at Vlasceanu, Ene & Partners
The current period is characterized by several important enactments and proposals for normative acts regulating the construction sector. We would like to discuss only two of such acts that already entered into force/were released for public consultation in the last weeks.
PROPOSAL FOR AMENDMENT OF THE APPLICATION NORMS TO THE CONSTRUCTION LAW
In March 2018, the Ministry of Regional Development released for public consultation a draft order (the ‘Draft Order’) for amending the Application Norms (the ‘Application Norms’) of Law no 50/1991 regarding construction authorization.
The purpose of the Draft Order resides primarily in the correlation of the Application Norms with other normative acts relevant to the construction sector (e.g. Law no 50/1991 regarding construction authorization and Law no 350/2001 on urbanism). However, several changes do worth a closer consideration as their implications point out the direction preferred by the current legislator:
Authorizing’ constructions erected without a permit
There are plenty of situations when existing constructions lack the construction permit, especially if they were built by state authorities during communist times (e.g. pipelines, wells, industrial parks, hospitals, public institutions etc). As such, there had to be a procedure to address these cases. The Application Norms currently contain (under Article 59) the so-called ‘reenter into legality’ procedure which is applicable to constructions erected without permit. It requires to perform a technical expertise and obtain an environmental permit in order to bring such constructions into legality.
At the same time, Article 5 under the 2010 Methodology for the evaluation of the environmental impact sets forth that the evaluation of the environmental impact cannot be made after a project was completed. Since the Application Norms refer specifically to completed constructions, it renders that Article 59 of the Application Norms is clearly contradicting Article 5 of the Methodology for the evaluation of environmental impact.
If adopted, the Draft Order would remove such contradiction as it proposes to have the ‘re-enter into legality’ procedure applied only to constructions that do not require an environmental permit (point 49 of the Draft Order).
At the moment, Article 30 of the Application Norms uses a rather unclear language describing when the urbanism certificate is required. In practice, the authorities always ask for an urbanism certificate. The proposed language under Point 30 of the Draft Order clarifies this aspect and stating that obtaining an urbanism certificate is always mandatory condition for starting the construction/ demolishment permitting.
There are numerous examples of major projects delayed due to lack of proper response from the authorities. Along the same line, the Draft Order intends to induce a clearer disciple regarding response time of the authorities (e.g. verification of the documentation for urbanism certificate must be performed within 10 days – as per the proposed amendment of Article 10 under the Draft Order).
Enabling the implementation of online consultation techniques
We salute the legislator’s intention to introduce online consultation of the registry of all urbanism certificates (point 34 of the Draft Order) as well as the obligation to publish on the authority’s website the restrictions of the urbanism documentations in place (point 36 of the Draft Order). It would be a step closer to normality towards bringing the public administration into the modern days.
NEW REGULATION FOR LAND REMOVAL FROM AGRICULTURAL CIRCUIT
On 28 February 2018, the Ministry of Agriculture issued Order no 83/2018 approving the Regulation for land removal from agricultural circuit. Such a regulation is extremely important for energy operators as most of them operate/facilities objectives located extramuros (Romanian: extravilan).
Just to state a matter of principle, the obligation to remove the land from agricultural circuit is provided under the urbanism certificate (and the decision approving such removal has be included subsequently in the documentation necessary for obtaining the building permit).
Relevant changes (compared to the previous framework):
• The obligation of the authority issuing the decision for land removal from agricultural circuit to obtain the endorsement of the competent Land Registry Office (‘LRO’) was repealed.
• For areas smaller than one hectare (i.e. 10,000 sq. m), the term for issuing the decision for removal from agricultural circuit was extended from maximum 20 working days to 30 working days (as of receipt of the complete documentation - Article 7 of the Order).
• For areas between 2-100 ha the decision for land removal must be issued based on the endorsement of the Ministry of Agriculture. It has to be issued within five working days after receiving the Ministry’s endorsement, yet there is no maximum deadline for the Ministry’s endorsement...
• For areas larger than 100 ha, same as before, the Government must issue the decision for removal from agricultural circuit. However, the necessary consents have been reduced (now only the Ministry of Agriculture’s consent is sufficient).
Judging by the numerous legal initiatives observed in the first three months of this year (including a proposal to amend the Law no 50/1991 regarding construction authorization), one may reasonably state that the construction sector undergoes a sparkling legislative period. We salute the legislator’s intention to correlate the relevant normative acts as well as to impose a stricter disciple regarding the authorities’ reaction time. At the same time, we can only hope that the legal framework to be put in place will enable practical solutions and not facilitate more problems (as we have signalled in our comment published in the February 2018 edition when analysing the proposed amendments to Law no 50/1991).